The 50% Rule: Why Collateral Ratios Protect Both Borrowers and Lenders

When people borrow against bitcoin, one number quietly governs whether the experience is boring and productive or stressful and expensive: the collateral ratio. In practice, well-run lenders and prudent borrowers converge on a simple heuristic: start near 50% loan-to-value (LTV) and give yourself room. That “50% rule” isn’t arbitrary. It reflects how bitcoin behaves in real markets, how margin policies are written, and how risk transfers between the two sides of the loan.

When people borrow against bitcoin, one number quietly governs whether the experience is boring and productive or stressful and expensive: the collateral ratio. In practice, well-run lenders and prudent borrowers converge on a simple heuristic: start near 50% loan-to-value (LTV) and give yourself room. That “50% rule” isn’t arbitrary. It reflects how bitcoin behaves in real markets, how margin policies are written, and how risk transfers between the two sides of the loan.

Volatility is real, plan for it instead of predicting it

Bitcoin’s history includes breathtaking rallies and equally sharp retracements. Across cycles, peak-to-trough drawdowns of 60–80% have occurred, and even within uptrends, double-digit pullbacks are common. Research houses and market trackers regularly document these drops; for example, NYDIG’s cycle work shows large intra-cycle drawdowns aligned with halving cycles, while mainstream outlets like CoinDesk continue to note deep swings even in expansionary phases. These are not outliers; they are the statistical texture of the asset.

A 50% starting LTV acknowledges that reality. If you borrow $50,000 against $100,000 of BTC and price falls 20%, your collateral drops to $80,000 and your LTV rises to 62.5%. You still have room to breathe. At a 30% drop, LTV is ~71%; that’s uncomfortable, but not automatically fatal if your lender’s first action is a margin alert rather than immediate liquidation. A 40% drop pushes LTV above 83%, which is why beginning materially below the maximum leaves you options when markets move fast.

Margin policies make the case for headroom

Read lenders’ rulebooks and the 50% rule makes more sense. Documented policies commonly warn or “margin call” around 70% LTV and liquidate near 80% LTV if the borrower doesn’t act. Other providers publish similar bands margin call near 70%, cure back to ~60%, and partial liquidation if the call isn’t met within a short window. These thresholds are designed around the very moves bitcoin can and does make. Starting near 50% keeps you meaningfully below the tripwires most of the time.

From the lender’s perspective, those buffers are how you avoid principal losses when price gaps lower overnight. From the borrower’s perspective, they are how you avoid forced sales at bad prices. The same ratio protects both sides.

Custody design affects whose risk you are taking

Collateral ratios are not the only defense. How collateral is held single-party custody vs. collaborative multi-signature, with or without rehypothecation determines whether you are taking market risk alone, or market plus counterparty risk. Several bitcoin-native lenders now make public commitments to no rehypothecation and publish “collaborative custody” explanations so clients can see why coins cannot be moved unilaterally and can be observed on-chain. Those design choices don’t change volatility, but they reduce the chance that someone else’s balance-sheet problem becomes yours especially relevant after the sector’s 2022 shake-outs.

The market is smaller, but sturdier, another reason to stay conservative

Since 2021’s peak, crypto lending has reset. Galaxy Research estimates total crypto lending (including on-chain CDP stablecoin debt) at $36.5 billion in Q4 2024, down 43% from the 2021 high. The contraction reflects weaker supply from failed lenders and more cautious demand from borrowers, but it has also pushed the industry toward tighter risk controls, clearer disclosures, and more conservative LTVs. In a market that is rebuilding rather than booming, a 50% rule is not just prudence, it’s alignment with how capital is currently willing to lend.

Why 50% is the right default, even if you could borrow more

Mathematically, the space between a 50% entry and a 70% margin-call line is a 40% collateral price move. That is enough to cover many sharp but routine sell-offs without forcing action in hours. It buys time to top up collateral or partially repay, and it reduces the probability that a transitory wick triggers a forced sale at your worst moment. For lenders, the same gap lowers default probability and the operational burden of emergency liquidations in stressed markets. Everyone benefits from fewer cliff-edge events.

Taxes and economics: borrowing keeps your exposure

In many jurisdictions, loan proceeds are generally not income because you incur a matched liability; by contrast, selling the asset is a taxable disposition and loan forgiveness can create income. The IRS’s own publication on taxable and nontaxable income articulates these distinctions clearly, and tax practitioners emphasize how canceled-debt income is reported. The point is not tax avoidance; it is that a properly structured collateral loan lets you solve liquidity without exiting your long-term thesis, and without automatically creating income on day one. (Always confirm local rules.)

A borrower’s playbook that respects the 50% rule

Think in terms of boring, repeatable steps. Begin at or below 50% LTV so routine volatility doesn’t become a fire drill. Monitor the lender’s alert, margin-call, and liquidation thresholds in writing and know how much time you have to cure. Keep a plan to top up collateral or repay quickly if alerts hit. And evaluate custody and rehypothecation up front so you know whether you are only managing market risk or also bearing someone else’s credit risk. When these basics are followed, bitcoin-backed loans function like they should: short-term liquidity that preserves long-term upside, with transparent rules that keep both sides protected.

The 50% collateral ratio isn’t folklore; it is a practical synthesis of bitcoin’s volatility profile, documented margin policies, and a maturing post-2022 lending market. For borrowers, it maximizes the chance you keep your coins through rough patches and repay on your schedule. For lenders, it minimizes loss severity and operational stress when markets move. In a world where the asset can fall 20–30% in a few days and 60% over a cycle, starting near 50% LTV is the simplest way to align incentives and share risk fairly.

Educational only—this is not financial or tax advice. Confirm terms, custody, and local regulations before borrowing or lending.

Continue reading